NASTY! The inside story of Operation 34A and the Nasty-class PT
boats - and the crews that manned them during the Viet-Nam War
Jack H. Jennings and Tran Do Cam
Most
Americans consider that our involvement in the Vietnamese War began
with the Tonkin Gulf incident. The fact is our involvement began
almost immediately following the 1954 Geneva Peace Accords that
divided the country at the 17th parallel. The Pentagon Papers leaked
some information, but the whole story of this operation is only
now becoming known. Immediately following the Accords, CIA Director
Allen Dulles sent Air Force Colonel Edward Lansdale to Viet-Nam
as Deputy Director of the Office of Special Operation with orders
to implement clandestine operations against the North. Highly experienced
in such operations, in the 1950s Lansdale performed similar duties
for President Magasasay ridding the Philippines of Huk Communists.
Lansdale recruited and trained Vietnamese civilians to carry out
the initial counter-insurgency operations against North Viet-Nam.
Lansdale relied on a variety of ethnic Vietnamese crews to accomplish
this mission including Nung and other minorities that came from
areas close to the Chinese border. For security reasons, Lansdale
used Saipan as a training center. Later, the CIA borrowed trained
counter-insurgency operatives from Taiwan for commando raids into
North Viet-Nam. Early operations used native junks since they blended
into the fishing boats off the North Vietnamese waters. These operations
continued over the years, some highly successful while others were
less so, resulting in the complete loss of some crews. The code
name for these operations was NAUTILUS after the mysterious submarine
from Jules Verne’s 20,000 Leagues Under The Sea. Missions consisted
of inserting spies recruited by the CIA and commando raids conducted
by Republic of Viet-Nam frogmen. As the NVN Navy improved intelligence
g athering capabilities, the routes used by NAUTILUS missions became
well known and the junks soon lost their advantage of blending in.
The NVN simply waited for the junks to cross the 17th parallel.
The junk’s slow speed and weak firepower became too much of a disadvantage
against North Viet-Nam’s heavily armed Swatow and P-4 gunboats.
In July 1962, the CIA and the Department of Defense determined
that the CIA did not have the operational capability and capacity
to effectively carry out the mission and determined that the DOD
should have operational control. Admiral Harry Flelt, Commander
in Chief, Pacific, analyzed the situation and recommended that PT
boats and frogmen be used to carry out the mission. President Kennedy,
himself a WWII PT boat commander, liked the idea and approved its
immediate implementation. On 1 January 1963 the Military Assistance
Command, Viet-Nam Special Operations Group (MACV-SOG) assumed the
responsibility for operations.
Operations
Plan 34A
In May 1963, the Joint Chiefs of Staff directed Admiral Flelt to
prepare a plan to support the RVN Navy effort to carry out special
operations in North Viet-Nam. On 14 August the JCS approved the
final plan that became OPLAN 34-63. Slight adjustments were again
made and approved on 9 Sep 63. Before fully implemented, a coup
d’etat against President Ngo Dinh Diem took place on 3 Nov. Despite
the command confusion, commando raids continued under OPLAN 34-63.
By December MACV-SOG became disappointed with performance and sought
ARVN military participation. A new plan, known as OPLAN 34A was
prepared that included ARVN with U.S. Navy support and was approved
by JCS on 15 Dec. Secretary of Defense McNamara and President Johnson
wanted to deliver a strong message to North Viet-Nam that the U.S.
would not accept the Communist invasion of the RVN. The main objective
was to combine the attacks against the North with diplomatic pressure
to warn the North to cease their infiltration in Laos and RVN. Thus,
the United States entered into a new phase of the clandestine operations
against the North.
To support this operation, the U.S. Navy set up a base in Da Nang
consisting of SEALS, U.S. Marine intelligence officers and other
specialists experienced in guerrilla operations. Two PT boat crews
along with necessary maintenance crews were sent to train Vietnamese
crews in PT boat operations and methods to use them in commando
raids. On 21 Jan 64, JCS approved the implementation of the first
phase of OPLAN 34A. The maritime section of OPLAN 34A had the main
objective of conducting operations on the sea routes and to engage
in psychological warfare against North Viet-Nam. The JCS maintained
tight control over operational planning leaving the details of completing
the plan to MACV-SOG personnel.
The organizational structure that specialized in running the coastal
commando operations consisted of the Vietnamese Navy Coastal Security
Service comprised of VN SEALS and boat crews and technical specialists.
All Vietnamese SEAL teams and boat crews were recruited from the
brightest and best of the VN Navy with superior service records.
In addition, a small number of VN Army specialists were recruited
and trained in SEAL tactics. The junks were rapidly replaced with
Nasty-class PT boats. At that time, the Nasty was considered the
best and most modern PT boat in the world.
Tonkin Gulf incident
By early 1964, operations using the newly arrived PT boats were
in full swing with excellent success. On 30 Jul 64, impressed with
the operational success, the JCS ordered to triple the August schedule
over that of July. This was a six-fold increase over the June schedule.
On the night of 30 Jul, the more aggressive schedule involved a
nighttime raid on Hon Me and Hon Nieu islands off Thanh Hoa coast.
This was a four-boat raid involving PTF-2, PTF-3, PTF-5 and PTF-6.
(PTF-2 was one of the gasoline-powered boats; the others were Nastys).
At midnight, the four boats split up and headed for their respective
objectives. At Hon Me, a fuselage of heavy machine gun bullets met
PTF-3 and PTF-6 causing heavy damage to the bow of PTF-6 and wounding
four crewmen. Suddenly, a crewman sighted a Swatow patrol boat mooring
near the island. With insufficient time to get a SEAL team ashore
to blow up the target, the crew blasted a water tower and several
military buildings with 40mm and 20mm gunfire. Caught in the glare
of an illumination flare fired by the Swatow, the PTFs continued
to pour fire into the targets. In less than 25 minutes, the attack
was over. It was now 30 minutes into 1 Aug. Both boats sped away
at 55 knots, easily outdistancing the Swatow only making about 45
knots.
At Hon Nieu, PTF-2 and PTF-5 had better luck. They approached unnoticed
and hammered a communications tower silhouetted in the moonlight.
Only light machine gun fire was returned with no damage. After 45
minutes of pounding the tower and other targets, both boats raced
back to Da Nang. North Viet-Nam lodged a complaint with the International
Control Commission; the United States denied involvement. In response,
the North Vietnamese commenced a buildup of their naval presence
and shifted about one-third of their 50 P-4 and Swatow gunboats
from Hai Phong to that area. General Westmoreland recognized that
the successful 34A operations were responsible for this response.
At about the same time as the implementation of OPLAN 34A, the
Navy began Desoto patrols along the coast that were designed to
eavesdrop on communications from North Viet-Nam. These patrols were
conducted by American tin cans that were careful to stay in international
waters, at least four miles off shore in the case of North Viet-Nam.
General Westmoreland and Admiral Sharp, Pacific Fleet Commander-in-Chief,
had discussed using the Desoto patrols to assist in the direct conduct
of 34A operations; however, this was abandoned to preserve the plausible
deniability of U.S. involvement. Nevertheless, in July 1964, Westmoreland
had requested that Desoto monitor the upcoming 34A operations in
case they were needed for support.
Two days following the attacks on Hon Nieu and Hon Me, at 1600
on 2 Aug, frustrated with its inability to interdict the Nasty boats,
North Viet-Nam launched a torpedo attack against USS Maddox (DD
731) using four Soviet torpedo boats. Maddox, supported by aircraft
from USS Ticonderoga (CVA 14), shot up the attacking boats leaving
one boat dead in the water. The battle was over in 22 minutes. Maddox
took machine gun rounds from a North Vietnamese PT boat, but steamed
out of the area without further damage and no loss of life. The
North Vietnamese had naturally connected the Desoto destroyers with
the events of late July and early August since Maddox was steaming
off the coast of Hon Me Island at the time.
Undeterred by the events of 2 Aug, the maritime operations from
Da Nang launched a four-boat 34A operation on 3 Aug. The objective
was to bombard a radar station at Vinh Son and a security post on
the banks of the Ron River; both about 90 miles north of the 17th
parallel. PTF-1, PTF-2, PTF-5 and PTF6 were involved. After a successful
attack, the PT boats kicked into flank speed of 50-plus knots easily
outdistancing pursuing enemy Swatows. Knocking out the radar station
blinded North Viet-Nam, contributing to their confusion.
On 4 Aug, Maddox and USS Turner Joy (DD 951) reported that they
were involved in an attack. The next day planes from Ticonderoga
and USS Constellation (CVA 64) struck an oil storage site in North
Viet-Nam and destroyed coastal vessels. On 7 Aug, the U.S. Congress
passed the Tonkin Gulf Resolution with overwhelming support. It
is well known now that the 4 Aug attack did not actually occur.
This series of events permanently disrupted attempts by President
Johnson to send a message to the North Vietnamese government through
the Canadian delegation to stop its war against the South, thus
setting the course of action for the next 10 years.
The ICC immediately headed for Da Nang to investigate the PT boat
base. In the meantime, the Navy relocated the PT boats south to
Cam Ranh Bay where they lay low until the ICC investigation was
over; a week later they were back in Da Nang, the crew having spent
the week camping out on a small pier. Back in Washington, President
Johnson ordered a halt in 34A operations to avoid any ambiguous
message. By now, the veil of secrecy as to the location of the PT
boats was thin. Ambassador Maxwell Taylor, in Saigon, objected to
the halt of operations. Following the Tonkin Gulf Resolution, the
attacks again commenced in earnest.
Why the Nasty-class PT boat?
The
search for a boat dates back to 1959 when the Navy was looking to
replace the aging WWII torpedo boats. The top choice was the 80-foot
Nasty-class patrol boat used with considerable success by the Norwegian
Navy since 1957. Built in Norway, the boat had two British-built
supercharged diesel engines delivering 3,100 shaft horsepower and
could reach speeds of 44 knots fully loaded and speeds of over 50
knots after burning off some fuel. The cruising range could extend
to about 1,000 miles at a speed of 20 knots. The Navy ordered 16
Nasty-class boats and classified them as Patrol Torpedo, Fast, or
PTF.
To fill in the demand before the Nastys arrived, Navy planners
found two old WWII vintage PT boats. These boats were powered by
Packard engines running on gasoline, but proved unreliable in this
mission due to engine problems and noise. In fact, the engines were
difficult to start at times and this proved to be a serious weakness
when inserted into North Viet-Nam waters and being surprised by
a Russian-made P-4 or Swatow patrol boat. By the end of 1965, when
enough Nastys became available, the gasoline boats were replaced
and used for target practice.
The firepower of the Nasty
was significant, consisting of a 40mm gun on the aft deck and two
20mm guns, one on the port and one on the starboard side. An 81mm
mortar with a 50-caliber machine gun mounted piggyback was placed
forward of the bridge. On some missions, the crews carried a 57mm
recoilless rifle for additional firepower.
In total, 16 Nasty boats saw service in Viet-Nam. As the demand
for 34A operations increased and some were lost in action, an American
company, Trumpy Boat Company, commenced building a knock-off of
the Nasty called the Osprey. The Ospreys were of aluminum construction
while the Nastys were laminated wood. The flexibility of the wooden
construction actually proved to be superior and some of the Osprey
design developed stress cracks in battle conditions and at flank
speed in rough seas.
Action North
Many of the missions north of the 17th were simply milk runs with
a continuous threat of meeting up with shore bombardment, attack
by air or an attack by P-4 or Swatow gunboats. In addition, the
North Vietnamese sometimes used suicide junks to try to sink a Nasty.
During the length of the war, only one boat was lost to direct enemy
action when a North Vietnamese biplane dropped a homemade bomb that
hit PTF-9 on the fantail, flooding the engine room. Other boats
were lost when they ran aground racing south following an attack
or while being chased by an enemy gunboat.
Direct action against the Russian-made P-4 and Swatow gunboats
was always one-sided. The Nasty was a superior boat with superior
crews and superior firepower. In most cases, the North Vietnamese
simply avoided direct combat or faked engine trouble to avoid a
fight, or they radioed back that the Nasty was pulling away out
of gunfire range. The after-action report by some aggressive Nasty
officers sets the tone for the entire war:
On the night of 19-20 Feb 71, four PTFs were near Hon Nieu observing
and photographing Chinese shipping. Suddenly the boats were attacked
by a North Vietnamese P-4, which was engaged and easily sunk. Mission
compromised; the four PTFs headed south and within an hour were
engaged by a P-4 and a Swatow. The PTFs left the attacking boats
heavily damaged and continued south. Between Hon Gio Island and
the coast, a P-4 torpedo boat and a Shanghai-class gunboat again
attacked them. The PTFs left the attacking boats damaged and sped
back to Da Nang at 55 knots, undamaged and with one KIA.
During the duration of OPLAN 34A, the Nastys sank the majority
of the P-4 boats.
Missions
OPLAN 34A missions were of a strategic nature primarily involving
clandestine psychological warfare and secondarily commando raids
to destroy military targets. Psychological operations included tax
extraction from fishing boats, propaganda distribution using the
81mm mortar and other operations creating havoc behind enemy lines.
Some included taking snatches to Cu Lao Cham Island offshore from
Da Nang where they were well fed and led to believe that they actually
lived in a secret liberation zone of the “Sacred Sword of Patriotic
League” located in North Viet-Nam. Later they were taken back to
the north, plump and well fed, with the expectation that they would
spread the story of the lifestyle outside of communism. Most of
the psychological operations occurred north of the 18th parallel
in more densely populated areas. Additionally, psyc-operations included
dropping radios with a fixed frequency set on a CIA-run station.
Vietnamese SEAL teams
conducted raids and shore bombardment missions designed to destroy
specific targets and to extract snatches. Military snatches in these
missions were also carried to an offshore island for interrogation
and perhaps reeducation.
The following first-hand account describes the typical psychological
operation:
“During 1967, we undertook a special psychological warfare program.
We captured more than 300 fishermen in a three-month period. We
took two individuals from every village. After delivering them to
Cu Lao Cham we made sure that they were well fed. Each person ate
a half chicken every day and after three months, was plump and had
a healthy complexion. We took each back to their hometown to see
what the reaction would be both locally and to the regime. It came
as no surprise to us during the next six months that when we tried
to capture the same individuals, they were nowhere to be found.
After almost nine months had passed, we finally captured one fellow
who signed: ‘You folks hurt us. When you released us, the local
government officials noticed that we were fat so they put us in
the thought reform camps and just released us’.”
Crews
The Vietnamese Navy recruited boat officers from the most motivated
and highest ranked graduates of the Naval Academy. Likewise, boat
crews came from the most capable and experienced seamen. Motivation
and esprit de corps were always high among the crews and MACV-SOG
maintained morale by supplementing their pay with an extra payment
and special rations for each trip north. As an example of the high
morale, crewmen always volunteered for difficult missions in addition
to their own schedules.
There were rumors that American personnel were on board PTFs on
missions to the north. This is not true, at least from 1965 to 1970
when the authors were with the PTFs in Da Nang.
Over the roughly eight years in operation, OPLAN 34A sent over
1,000 missions into waters off North Viet-Nam. Nearly all missions
were successful and achieved their primary or secondary objective.
Few were a complete bust and none failed because of poor leadership
or lack of skill. As an example of leadership and seamanship, the
Vietnamese crews had less than 40 casualties out of the thousands
of individual missions. The single worst skirmish was a blue-on-blue
event with one boat losing two officers. Clearly, the crews that
manned the Nastys were the best that Viet-Nam had to offer and they
lived up to the highest standards.
Editor’s note: Jack Jennings served with boat Support Unit 1
from 1965-66. He now resides in Dallas, TX, and can be reached by
e-mail at jack@jennings.net. Tran Do Cam served for five years as
Executive Officer and Commanding Officer of PTFs. He now resides
in Austin, TX, and can be reached by e-mail at docam11@yahoo.com.
|